• American unilateralism has ..
  • American Unilateralism

Tony Cartalucci accuses these organisationsof being foreign bodies interfering in Thailand's domestic politics via Thaksinand the Red Movement.

American unilateralism has to do with ..

History of Multilateralism in Foreign Policy

Preëmption has since emerged as the overriding idea behind theAdministration’s foreign policy.
"In March 1995, the Center was quickly established as a leading participantin the debate over American foreign policy by its highly successful nationalpolicy conference 'After Victory: Defining an American Role in an UncertainWorld.' The conference addressed fundamental questions about U.S.

Unilateralism: Anatomy of a Foreign Policy Disaster

Is collusion in this myth and junior participation in this projectreally a proper aspiration for British foreign policy?
foreign policyperspectives for the 21st century."..."The Center is funded through a combinationof corporate and individual donations in addition to foundation grants."...


Unilateralism: Anatomy of a Foreign Policy ..

The police have told the MPthat the culprits must have carried out detailed research of his movementsbefore deciding where and when to plant the bomb.
The neoconservative worldview is characterised by militarism, unilateralism and a firm commitment to Zionism. Even the Israel-friendly British foreign secretary Jack Straw said of the neocon Irving Libby: “It’s a toss-up whether Libby is working for the Israelis or the Americans on any given day.” The neoconservatives aimed for an Israelisation of American policy, conflating Israeli and American enemies.

Treasury and warbonds, to their foreign clients overseas as Hitler geared up for his 1939invasion of Poland, the event that sparked World War II.
"…of all the elements of U.S. military force posture, perhaps none is more in need of reevaluation than America’s nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons remain a critical component of American military power but it is unclear whether the current U.S. nuclear arsenal is well-suited to the emerging post-Cold War world. Today’s strategic calculus encompasses more factors than just the balance of terror between the United States and Russia. U.S. nuclear force planning and related arms control policies must take account of a larger set of variables than in the past, including the growing number of small nuclear arsenals – from North Korea to Pakistan to, perhaps soon, Iran and Iraq – and a modernized and expanded Chinese nuclear force. Moreover, there is a question about the role nuclear weapons should play in deterring the use of other kinds of weapons of mass destruction, such as chemical and biological, with the U.S. having foresworn those weapons’ development and use. It addition, there may be a need to develop a new family of nuclear weapons designed to address new sets of military requirements, such as would be required in targeting the very deep under-ground, hardened bunkers that are being built by many of our potential adversaries" (p. 8).

growing American unilateralism has ..

In many parts of the world, a thin line of American GIs is the land mine. The main reason that the U.S. opposed the land mine treaty is that we need them in places like the DMZ in Korea. Sweden and Canada and France do not have to worry about an invasion from North Korea killing thousands of their soldiers. We do. Therefore, as the unipolar power and as the guarantor of peace in places where Swedes do not tread, we need weapons that others do not. Being uniquely situated in the world, we cannot afford the empty platitudes of allies not quite candid enough to admit that they live under the protection of American power. In the end, we have no alternative but to be unilateralist. Multilateralism becomes either an exercise in futility or a cover for inaction.

Perceptions of American unilateralism remain ..

The futility of it is important to understand. The entire beginning of the unipolar age was a time when this country, led by the Clinton administration, eschewed unilateralism and pursued multilateralism with a vengeance. Indeed, the principal diplomatic activity of the U.S. for eight years was the pursuit of a dizzying array of universal treaties: the comprehensive test ban treaty, the chemical weapons convention, the biological weapons convention, Kyoto and, of course, land mines.

America And Unilateralism In Iraqi War

Of course, unilateralism does not mean seeking to act alone. One acts in concert with others when possible. It simply means that one will not allow oneself to be held hostage to others. No one would reject Security Council support for war on Iraq or for any other action. The question is what to do if, at the end of the day, the Security Council or the international community refuses to back us? Do we allow ourselves to be dictated to on issues of vital national interest? The answer has to be “no,” not just because we are being willful, but because we have a special role, a special place in the world today, and therefore a special responsibility.