• Funding for solar energy projects/programs
  • “Maximum solar generation occurs in the spring ” :

Thomas P. Kimbis, interim president for Solar Energy Industries Association, wrote the following:

Solar Action Alliance - Solar Panel Energy Information …

High Desert Energy - Solar, Wind Energy, Renewable Energy

Is Solar Energy World the best solar installer for you
It's not utility customers, uh, excuse us, 'consumers,' this 'masquerading pro-solar-energy initiative' will protect - it's big, for-profit utilities that look to secure their monopolies.

solar access laws, solar energy laws, solar laws, Ca state …

Amendment 1 grants no additional rights to everyday Floridians. If voters want to support a true free market for energy consumption in this state and help consumers in the process, they should reject Amendment 1, which merely keeps people under the thumb of big utilities ... if Amendment 1 passes, we may as well write the obituary for the solar-power market in the Sunshine State.


Residential Solar Power in Nevada - …

The electricity giants such as Florida Power & Light vehemently deny any motives other than to protect the consumer. But why would they have put up $21 million to ensure the amendment’s passage if not to further their own interests? ... The amendment now facing voters would guarantee consumers 'the right to own or lease solar equipment installed on their property to generate electricity for their own use.' But Floridians already have that right under state law. ... If you want to speed the day when you can put an affordable solar panel on your roof, reject this cynical ballot measure. Vote no on Amendment 1.

…this amendment seems to benefit the utilities more than the consumers. It creates even more of a monopoly, keeping entities other than large utilities from leasing solar panels to homes and businesses and selling the excess energy on the grid.

A Guide to Solar Access Laws; Benefits of Solar Power; ..

Florida's so-called Smart Solar amendment is 'smart' only for the utility companies that have poured more than $20 million into this attempt to guarantee that they can keep their monopoly on consumer energy. The amendment is meant to confuse Floridians, and the state's Supreme Court never should have let it get on the ballot. We strongly urge voters to say 'No' to Amendment 1.

financing for solar power systems and other clean energy ..

PS: 2 kWp more of solar would be around 8,000 USD (5,600 USD if 30% federal tax credit applies). It is not easy to tell without running some better numbers, but from the graphs it seems like that could solve the energy deficit.

Residential Solar Panels In Phoenix, Arizona | Costs & …

So demand assumptions may be correct, but I cannot help questioning the assumption that the yearly solar generation would exactly match demand. Simply by reading your post, a potential powerwall buyer could realize it needs to overdimension the solar array. Not to say that, if Mr. Bynum consults a good PV system engineer, this would run a simulation and find out he needs and by how much to oversize the solar array. Probably adding a few more panels is a much cheaper option than going for the 80 powerwalls, should the purpose of Mr. Bynum go off-grid.

Using solar energy to generate power is an environmental-friendly ..

In this case, witness the misleading epithet that the powerful utility industry conceived to peddle Amendment 1: Consumers for Smart Solar. Should there be truth in advertising on this, an accurate campaign title would be: Utilities for a Stronger Monopoly on Power. ... The pivotal issue revolves around the third-party sale of electricity, by which owners of solar-equipped homes or businesses sell excess energy to neighbors. Or a solar company installs panels on a home, retains ownership and then sells the power generated by the equipment. The likelihood? Cheaper electricity than sold by utilities. ... The Bradenton Herald Editorial Board recommends a no vote on Amendment 1.