• Solutions To The Illegal Immigration Problem
  • Illegal immigration to the United States - Wikipedia
  • How To Resolve The Problem Of Illegal Immigration In …

Facts, Figures and Statistics Show the Costs and A Dark Side To Illegal Immigration

The Problem Isn`t Just Illegal Immigration ..

Mythologies of Illegal Immigration - American Greatness

Download the .pdf version Are massive legal immigration and massive illegal immigration related
The creation of new tensions and conflicts, and the greater degree of political disengagement, has led to a new debate about social cohesion and national identity. These new debates have coincided with the arrival of a new wave of migrants, largely from Eastern Europe. Just as in the 1950s, the presence of the new immigrants has become a lightning rod for the wider concerns. So, rather than see the problems of political disengagement and social conflict as the result of policy decisions taken over the past two decades, they have come to be seen as the result of immigration creating too much diversity.

T he illegal immigration debate has come to a head once again

5 facts about illegal immigration in the U.S
Illegal immigration imposes enormous costs -- monetary as well as crime-related -- on American society. As regards criminal activity, Manhattan Institute scholar describes one small slice of a much larger problem:

 

The Problem With Illegal Immigration | WannaLOL

What we know about illegal immigration from Mexico | …
The onset of mass immigration from India, Pakistan and the Caribbean in the late 1940s and the 1950s coincided with the dismantling of the British Empire, and the decline of Britain's global status. Immigration became the focus for the debate about these broader shifts. While policy makers welcomed the influx of new labour, there was at the same time considerable unease about the impact that such immigration may have on traditional concepts of Britishness. As a Colonial Office report of 1955 observed, 'a large coloured community as a noticeable feature of our social life would weaken... the concept of England or Britain to which people of British stock throughout the Commonwealth are attached.' These fears translated themselves into a concern about the need to control immigration. Immigration controls were seen, not as a means of matching immigrants to jobs, but of preventing the presence of too many non-white immigrants from tarnishing Britain's racial identity.


The problem for policy makers, however, was that they could not explicitly say so. To have introduced such discriminatory legislation would have caused moral outage at home and abroad and undermined Britain's standing in the world. The experience of Nazism and revulsion against the Holocaust had created hostility to openly racist legislation. This was particularly so because inhabitants of Britain's colonies were British subjects and had the legal right to live and work in this country. The story of British immigration laws is the story of the legal attempt to prevent British subjects of the wrong skin colour from exercising their legal rights.


Illegal Immigration/Refugees | Fellowship of the Minds

As a result, policy makers have seen their role as balancing the economic need for migrants against the social problems they create. The 'cross-departmental' government report on The Economic and Fiscal Impact of Immigration published last month, for instance, expresses broad support for immigration's positive effect on Britain's economy but fears about its negative impact on the country's social fabric. Why does immigration inevitably lead to fears about its social consequences? Largely because the presence of immigrants helps crystalise already existing social anxieties, particularly anxieties about national identity and social cohesion. To understand this better I want to take a brief look at the history of the debate about immigration and race relations in postwar Britain and to compare the debate about the first set of mass immigrants in Britain in the 1950s with the debate about the new wave of immigrants today.

Illegal Immigration: Costs, Crimes, & Related Problems …

In other words, immigration controls only made sense if they were discriminatory but they could not be openly seen to be so. The solution was found when Britain introduced its first immigration law in 1962. Formally, the law insisted that any immigrant to this country must first possess an employment voucher - so it appeared non-racial, simply matching people to jobs. But in private, policy makers were clear that the real aim was to stop non-white immigration. As Richard Crossman, a leading Labour Party thinking, wrote in his diaries, 'we have become illiberal... at a time of acute shortage of labour'. Or as the Conservative spokesman Reginald Maudling put it, 'The problem arises quite simply from the arrival in this country of many people of wholly alien cultures, habits and outlooks'. This tactic of presenting social concerns about immigration in the guise of a concern about numbers or job availiability has continued over the past 50 years.

Bloggers for Securing our Border and Ending Illegal Immigration

Policy debates about immigration generally focus on two broad themes: the impact of immigration upon the economy, and its social and cultural impact. The arguments in favour of immigration are generally couched in economic terms (though, of course, there are, and always have been, economic arguments against mass migration). The social impact of immigration , on the other hand, has usually been seen as negative. Immigrants are seen as taking up valuable resources, making it more difficult to cohere communities and undermining a sense of national identity.