• Evolution: The Beginnings of the Universe
  • I really do have a new theory of evolution.
  • What is Darwin's Theory of Evolution?

At times, the popular perception of evolution seems to be that it has been proven beyond all doubt and there are no scientific obstacles left for it.

Read more about this fascinating New Theory of Evolution:

Lucy vs. Adam and Eve: The theory of evolution in Africa

How can the theory of evolution be a viable theory if it cannot explain the origin of life?
Many scientific theories are so well-established that no new evidence is likely to alter them substantially. For example, no new evidence will demonstrate that the Earth does not orbit around the sun (heliocentric theory), or that living things are not made of cells (cell theory), that matter is not composed of atoms, or that the surface of the Earth is not divided into solid plates that have moved over geological timescales (the theory of plate tectonics). Like these other foundational scientific theories, the theory of evolution is supported by so many observations and confirming experiments that scientists are confident that the basic components of the theory will not be overturned by new evidence. However, like all scientific theories, the theory of evolution is subject to continuing refinement as new areas of science emerge or as new technologies enable observations and experiments that were not possible previously.

Theory of Evolution | Answers in Genesis

Likely the best characterization of Darwin would be to call him a 'weak atheist'.
What I don’t understand is why you think that Barbara McClintock’s work is somehow at odds with mainstream science’s understanding of biology, evolution, genetics, etc. Unfortunately for you, your position depends upon this fabricated conflict dreamt up by you and/or your ilk. If the conflict is not there – which it most certainly isn’t – then your argument falls apart. (By the way, don’t select random quotes by McClintock, which seem to support your position; look at what her research has proven about DNA and genes.)

 

One problem in the study of language evolution has been the ..


Perry, please consider not asking people to use their full names. I’m pretty certain some of the people commenting are pastors who could lose their positions if it was known they were entertaining theistic evolution.


Regarding your stubbornness about random mutation, you sound like Behe when he was presented with loads of evidence for evolution of the blood-clotting cascade in the Dover trial. With a stiff upper lip, he simply said it wasn’t enough to satisfy him. If that’s your tack, then there’s no debate.


part of an evolutionary theory of language.

In the next installment I’ll put my balls on the line and describe a half dozen predictions that this New Theory of Evolution makes. Predictions that will be either confirmed or overturned in the next 3-20 years.

Evolution | Definition of Evolution by Merriam-Webster

I am quite prepared to abandon the big bang theory if evidence for a steady state theory is solidified. The Big Bang appears to have strong support, though, and a steady state universe violates the law of entropy.

Darwin's Theory of Evolution: Definition & Evidence

This new theory has HUGE implications for the future discoveries of biology. It re-frames the entire evolution debate as a software engineering problem! We have all kinds of tools that can help.

A New Theory of Evolution - Cosmic Fingerprints

-That accidental file copying errors, culled by natural selection, were responsible for these evolutionary changes?

(When have you ever seen a software program or computer virus that accidentally evolved new features through a accidental copying errors?)

Theory of Evolution of Eukaryotic Cells - Sydney

By the way, put the $10,000 you offered to Bob Allen in escrow, first, and then get an acknowledged expert in the field in question to make the judgment. The only way you can win such a silly challenge in a debate is if you are the judge, and like Behe, you refuse any evidence supporting the opposite position. Where is there any evidence that DNA is designed? This requires a designer, which is much more difficult to explain/prove than the existence of DNA itself. Scriptures and your emotional need for them are not evidence!