• The Causes and Treatments of ADD-ADHD
  • Managing Medication for Adults with ADHD | CHADD
  • Treatments for ADHD: Homeopathic Remedies for …

Only three treatments have been proven to be effective for ADHD: behavior modification, medication, and the combination of the two.

The Feingold Diet and other Alternative Treatments for ADHD

ADHD Behavioral Treatment | Therapy for ADHD | Child …

For more information about ADHD Treatments and Therapy Services, please contact us.
Practicality as we use the term is distinct from efficacy and effectiveness. Efficacy refers to demonstrated treatment success in controlled research studies often taking place in clinical laboratories or university settings and typically designed, supervised, and executed by experts and their students and staff. Effectiveness refers to demonstrated treatment success in naturalistic settings more typical of those clinics, hospitals, and private practices in which patients are likely to seek treatment involving controlled scientific studies supervised or instituted by the clinicians typically practicing in those settings. Practicality here refers to the ease or convenience of carrying out the treatment and hence the likelihood of its adoption in ordinary clinical practice. Classroom management or intensive all day summer treatment approaches to ADHD may be both efficacious and effective yet may not necessarily be adopted in typical classroom or community settings if the labor they require for implementation is too great or the financial cost of doing so is disproportionate within the total school or community budget. This focus on practical considerations stems from a growing concern that empirically supported treatments are being under-utilized, not only with children with ADHD but in all of children’s mental health. The consequence of this situation is that there is a two-tiered pattern of outcomes in the extant research literature. Specifically, meta-analytic reviews of the literature have found substantial evidence of beneficial effects of interventions studied in research settings but little or no evidence of beneficial effects of interventions that were delivered in typical clinical settings (Weisz, 2004).

Dexedrine vs. Adderall: Two Treatments for ADHD

No treatment has been shown to influence outcomes in adolescents or adults with ADHD over the long term.
In a study published in the British Homeopathic Journal, Oct 1997, children afflicted with ADHD were given either a homeopathic treatment or a placebo for ten days, then parents or caregivers rated the children on the amount of ADHD behavior they displayed.

 

Learn behavioral treatments for ADHD in children

Consumers need to know how to evaluate these claims so they can determine the efficacy of such treatments.
1. Rules and instructions provided to children with ADHD must be clear, brief, and often delivered through more visible and external modes of presentation than is required for the management of normal children. Stating directions clearly, having the child repeat them out loud, having the child utter them softly to themselves while following through on the instruction, and displaying sets of rules or rule‑prompts (e.g. stop signs, big eyes, big ears for "stop, look, and listen" reminders) prominently throughout the classroom are essential to proper management of ADHD children. Relying on the child's recollection of the rules as well as upon purely verbal reminders is often ineffective.
2. Consequences used to manage the behavior of ADHD children must be delivered swiftly and more immediately than is needed for normal children. Delays in consequences greatly degrade their efficacy for children with ADHD. As will be noted throughout this chapter, the timing and strategic application of consequences with children with ADHD must be more systematic and is far more crucial to their management than in normal children. This is not just true for rewards, but is especially so for punishment which can be kept mild and still effective by delivering it as quickly upon the misbehavior as possible – Swift, not harsh, justice is the essence of effective punishment.
3. Consequences must be delivered more frequently, not just more immediately, to children with ADHD in view of their motivational deficits. Behavioral tracking, or the ongoing adherence to rules after the rule has been stated and compliance initiated, appears to be problematic for children with ADHD. Frequent feedback or consequences for rule adherence seem helpful in maintaining appropriate degrees of tracking to rules over time.
4. The type of consequences used with children with ADHD must often be of a higher magnitude, or more powerful, than that needed to manage the behavior of normal children. The relative insensitivity of children with ADHD to response consequences dictates that those chosen for inclusion in a behavior management program must have sufficient reinforcement value or magnitude to motivate children with ADHD to perform the desired behaviors. Suffice it to say, then, that mere occasional praise or reprimands are simply not enough to effectively manage children with ADHD.
5. An appropriate and often richer degree of incentives must be provided within a setting or task to reinforce appropriate behavior before punishment can be implemented. This means that punishment must remain within a relative balance with rewards or it is unlikely to succeed. It is therefore imperative that powerful reinforcement programs be established first and instituted over 1 to 2 weeks before implementing punishment in order for the punishment, sparingly used, to be maximally effective. Often children with ADHD will not improve with the use of response cost or time out if the availability of reinforcement is low in the classroom and hence removal from it is unlikely to be punitive. "Positives before negatives" is the order of the day with children with ADHD. When punishment fails, this is the first area which clinicians, consultations, or educators should explore for problems before instituting higher magnitude or more frequent punishment programs.
6. Those reinforcers or particular rewards which are employed must be changed or rotated more frequently with ADHD than normal children given the penchant of the former for more rapid habituation or satiation to response consequences, apparently rewards in particular. This means that even though a particular reinforcer seems to be effective for the moment in motivating child compliance, it is likely that it will lose its reinforcement value more rapidly than normal over time. Reward menus in classes, such as those used to back up token systems, must therefore be changed periodically, say every 2 to 3 weeks, to maintain the power of efficacy of the program in motivating appropriate child behavior. Failure to do so is likely to result in the loss of power of the reward program and the premature abandonment of token technologies based on the false assumption that they simply will not work any longer. Token systems can be maintained over an entire school year with minimal loss of power in the program provided that the reinforcers are changed frequently to accommodate to this problem of habituation. Such rewards can be returned later to the program once they have been set aside for a while, often with the result that their reinforcement value appears to have been improved by their absence or unavailability.
7. Anticipation is the key with children with ADHD. This means that teachers must be more mindful of planning ahead in managing children with this disorder, particularly during phases of transition across activities or classes, to insure that the children are cognizant of the shift in rules (and consequences) that is about to occur. It is useful for teachers to take a moment to prompt a child to recall the rules of conduct in the upcoming situation, repeat them orally, and recall what the rewards and punishments will be in the impending situation before entering that activity or situation. Think aloud, think ahead is the important message to educators here. As noted later, by themselves such cognitive self‑instructions are unlikely to be of lasting benefit but when combined with contingency management procedures can be of considerable aide to the classroom management of ADHD children.
8. Children with ADHD must be held more publicly accountable for their behavior and goal-attainment than normal children. The weaknesses in executive functioning associated with ADHD result in a child whose behavior is less regulated by internal information (mental representations) and less monitored via self-awareness than is the case in normal children. Addressing such weaknesses requires that the child with ADHD be provided with more external cues about performance demands at key “points of performance” in the school, be monitored more closely by teachers, and be provided with consequences more often across the school day for behavioral control and goal attainment than would be the case in normal children.
9. Behavioral interventions, while successful, only work while they are being implemented and, even then, require continued monitoring and modification over time for maximal effectiveness. One common scenario is that a student responds initially to a well-tailored program, but then over time, the response deteriorates; in other cases, a behavioral program may fail to modify the behavior at all. This does not mean behavioral programs do not work. Instead, such difficulties signal that the program needs to be modified. It is likely that one of a number of common problems occurred, such as the rewards lost their value, the program was not implemented consistently, or the program was not based on a functional analysis of the factors related to the problem behavior.

William Pelham, an expert in behavioral treatments for children with ADHD, describes five categories of behavioral treatment:
A second unique feature of Barkley’s approach to parent training is that there exists a considerable overlap of oppositional/defiant behavior with clinic-referred ADHD children and such children are recognized to have poorer adolescent and young adult outcomes (Hinshaw, 1987; Paternite & Loney, 1980; Weiss & Hechtman, 1993). ODD is recognized to at least partially originate in disrupted parenting and coercive family interactions (Barkley, 2013). Hence, appropriate training of parents must be provided for the oppositional/defiant behaviors associated with ADHD in such cases. The most useful vehicle for accomplishing both purposes seems to be training parents in behavioral techniques applied contingently for compliance or noncompliance (Barkley, 1997a, 2006).